Ventulett v. Maine Insurance Guaranty Association
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
This appeal raises a question of the interpretation of the Maine Insurance Guaranty Act, 24-A M.R.S.A. §§ 4431-4452 (1990 & Supp.1990), in its relationship to the workers’ compensation system. The Guaranty Act created the Maine Insurance Guaranty Association (MIGA) to administer a guaranty fund to cover certain obligations of insolvent insurers. Specifically, the issue before us is whether a claimant must offset the workers’ compensation benefits he has received against what MIGA would otherwise have to pay on a tort claim for the same injuries against a third party…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ferrari v. TotoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Gregg v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Sussman v. OstroffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Kinney v. LeamanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
3Cited by15 opinions
- Oglesby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- DeVane v. KennedyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
- Doucette v. PomesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. Rhode Island Insurers' Insolvency FundSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- New Hampshire Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Pitco Frialator, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.