Legal Opinion

Ventulett v. Maine Insurance Guaranty Association

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 10, 1990PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

This appeal raises a question of the interpretation of the Maine Insurance Guaranty Act, 24-A M.R.S.A. §§ 4431-4452 (1990 & Supp.1990), in its relationship to the workers’ compensation system. The Guaranty Act created the Maine Insurance Guaranty Association (MIGA) to administer a guaranty fund to cover certain obligations of insolvent insurers. Specifically, the issue before us is whether a claimant must offset the workers’ compensation benefits he has received against what MIGA would otherwise have to pay on a tort claim for the same injuries against a third party…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ferrari v. TotoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Gregg v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Sussman v. OstroffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Kinney v. LeamanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Oglesby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. DeVane v. KennedyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Doucette v. PomesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. Rhode Island Insurers' Insolvency FundSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  5. New Hampshire Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Pitco Frialator, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API