Lloyd-McAlpine Logging Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.
This award was made under the pro- • visions of sub. (3) (c), sec. 102.11, Stats., defining those conclusively presumed to be solely and wholly dependent for support upon a deceased employee. To support it in favor of these two children under the statute there must be in the record sufficient legal evidence to warrant the conclusion that they were living with Paul Whitefish at the time of his death, and further that there was no surviving dependent parent.
There is presented no difficulty in regard to the latter. The surviving parent, the mother, undivorced, had left the deceased and for four…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- City of Milwaukee v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- International Harvester Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Martilla v. Quincy Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Voelz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Drouin v. Ellis C. Snodgrass Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1941
- Meyer v. Nielsen Chevrolet Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- F. A. McDonald Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.