Legal Opinion

Stojic v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

It is the contention of the appellant that she was living with her deceased husband at the time of her death, and that by virtue of the provisions of sec. 102.11, Stats., it is conclusively presumed that she was totally dependent upon him at the time of his death. This court has decided a number of times that the question of whether the wife is living with her husband under circumstances such as are here presented is a question of fact. Northwestern I. Co. v. Industrial Comm. 154 Wis. 97, 142 N. W. 271; Smith v. Scheidegger Bros. 170 Wis, 162, 174 N. W. 462; Belle City M. I. Co. v. Rowland,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northwestern Iron Co. v. Indusrrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Village of Weyauwega v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Belle City Malleable Iron Co. v. RowlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Milwaukee Western Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Smith v. Scheidegger Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Olson-Walker Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Peterson v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API