Coke v. Equity Residential Properties Trust
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.
The defendant, Equity Residential Properties Trust (Equity), seeks interlocutory review of an order entered *512by a judge in the Superior Court to the effect that Mass. R. Prof. C. 1.7, 426 Mass. 1330 (1998),2 governing conflicts of interest does not mandate the disqualification of counsel for the plaintiffs, where the plaintiffs’ counsel of record, Mark A. Berthiaume, became a member of the law firm Seyfarth Shaw (Seyfarth), which at the time acted as counsel for Equity in other matters. Pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 118, Equity petitioned a single justice of the Appeals Court for interlocutory…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Lockhart v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Mary D. Tipton v. Canadian Imperial Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- McCourt Co., Inc. v. FPC Properties, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- In re Dayco Corp. Derivative Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maling v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLPMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Slade v. OrmsbyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Bryan Corp. v. AbranoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Gillette Co. v. ProvostMassachusetts Superior Court · 2016
- Micromet, Inc. v. Curis, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2009