Legal Opinion
Mary D. Tipton v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 17, 1989No. 87-8798PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FITZPATRICK, District Judge.
Mary Tipton brought this suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e-2(a)(l) and 2000e-3(a), and various provisions of State law alleging sex discrimination and retaliatory discharge, breach of contract, interference with a contractual relationship, and fraudulent and deceptive conduct on the part of Defendant Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) both before and during the employment relationship. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of CIBC on all of Tipton’s claims except those alleging disparate treatment and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Holifield v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Jessica Lind Meeks v. Computer Associates International, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Hanlon v. ChambersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Carolyn Smith, Intervenor v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- 79 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1132, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 786 Cynthia L. Taylor v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.