Legal Opinion

McCourt Co., Inc. v. FPC Properties, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 6, 1982PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

A law firm that represents client A in the defense of an action may not, at the same time, be counsel for a plaintiff in an action brought against client A, at least without the consent of both clients. It does not matter that the law firm represents client A as a defendant because it was selected as A’s counsel by A’s liability insurer. See Opinion 80-10, Opinions of the Committee on Professional Ethics of the Massachusetts Bar Association, 66 Mass. L. Rev. 50 (1981). The law firm is attorney for the insured as well as the insurer. See Imperiali v. Pica, 338 Mass. 494, 499 (1959). Nor does…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. In Re the Disbarment of GillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Herbert A. Sullivan, Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Jean Schmitz Leonard Schmitz v. Carlos J. Zilveti, III Nicholas S. Meris Prudential-Bache Securities Inc., AKA Prudential Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Maddocks v. RickerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Mailer v. MailerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Nevada Yellow Cab Corp. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API