Legal Opinion
In re Dayco Corp. Derivative Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 9, 1984No. Nos. C-3-82-184, C-3-82-254, C-3-82-329 and C-3-82-405PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTIONS TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL AND TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFF HEIST AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF DERIVATIVE STOCKHOLDERS; CONFERENCE CALL SET
RICE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in these cases, consolidated for pretrial purposes, are stockholders of the Defendant Dayco Corporation, and are suing Dayco, twelve directors of Dayco, and a Dayco employee for violations of various federal and state laws. See generally, In Re Dayco Corporation Derivative Securities Litigation, 99 F.R.D. 616 (S.D.Ohio1983) (decision of October 21, 1983, ruling on various discovery motions). Dayco has…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Arkansas Valley State Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- State v. HunsakerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Rogers v. Pittston Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1992
- Koenig v. BensonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.