Legal Opinion
State v. Boergadine
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 14, 2005No. 23,766, 23,767PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
{1} In this case, we hold that Defendant’s fraudulent taking of three payments in the course of completing work on one vehicle’s transmission justifies convicting him of three counts of fraud pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 30-16-6 (1987). Defendant James Kyle Boergadine appeals his conviction of three counts of fraud. Defendant also appeals the resulting revocation of his probation in another case that is consolidated with this one for purposes of this appeal. Defendant asserts that: (1) the three fraud counts were for one course of conduct, so that his conviction for all…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. RojoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. DuffyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Dylan J.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. OlssonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
- Kilgore v. FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.