Legal Opinion
State v. Franco
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 29, 2005No. 28,791PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
{1} Defendant appeals from convictions following a jury trial for possession of a controlled substance, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-23(D) (1990), and tampering with evidence, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-22-5 (1963, prior to 2003 amendment). Defendant initially appealed her convictions to the Court of Appeals on several grounds, including whether her conviction for possession of a controlled substance and tampering with evidence violated her right to be free from double jeopardy. State v. Franco, 2004-NMCA-099, ¶ 1, 136 N.M. 204, 96 P.3d 329. The Court of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Raymond Pandelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- State v. FosterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SosaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. SaizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. CaldwellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.