Legal Opinion

Davis v. Cornwell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 21, 1924No. 297PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Brandéis

delivered the opinion of the Court.

While the railroads were under federal control, Corn-well ordered of a station agent empty cars to be ready October 2, 1918, for loading with cattle to be transported in interstate commerce as common carrier. This action against Davis, the agent of the President designated under Transportation Act, 1920, was brought in a state court of Montana to recover damages for failure to supply the cars. The plaintiff sued on an express contract to furnish them on the day named. It was not shown, or contended, that the published tariffs governing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Harrison v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MaucherSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Easton v. DudleyTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Wood v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ChattersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Davis v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. United States v. Associated Air Transport, Inc., Associated Air Transport, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  5. United States v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API