Legal Opinion

Lewiston Orchards Irrigation District v. Gilmore

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1933No. 6002PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, C. J.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether or not land acquired by an irrigation district for nonpayment of delinquent assessments levied by said district is exempt from general taxation under the provisions of Const., art. 7, sec. 4, while owned by it. That constitutional provision reads as follows:

“The property of the United States, the state, counties, towns, cities and • other municipal corporations and public libraries shall be exempt from taxation.”

It is appellant’s contention that an irrigation district is a public qitasi-municipal corporation and as such included within the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Merchants National Bank v. Escondido Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bistline v. BassettIdaho Supreme Court · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Herndon v. WestIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State of Arizona v. Yuma Irr. Dist.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State Ex Rel. Goshen Irrigation District v. HuntWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Ada County Board of Equalization v. Highlands, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API