Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. Pioneer Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1930No. 5346PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, C. J.

Plaintiff-respondent sued the defendant-appellant, an irrigation district, for damages on two causes of action: First for injuries to the crops on his land during 1923, 1924, 1925 and 1926, caused by water seeping, percolating and escaping from appellant’s canal; and second, to recover for the permanent injury and destruction of two acres of the said land in an attempt to drain the same. The appeal is from a judgment on both causes of action.

Numerous assignments of error are made which, however, group themselves into the following divisions: First, the sufficiency of the complaint to state a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Boise Development Co. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  3. California Development Co. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
  4. Tormey v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Hidalgo County Water Improvement Dist. No. 2 v. HolderbaumTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  3. Lewiston Orchards Irrigation District v. GilmoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Burgess v. Salmon River Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Ketcham v. Modesto Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API