Wolfe v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P.J.
*801This case involves Article IV, section 1b, of the Oregon Constitution, which makes it "unlawful to pay or receive money or other thing of value based on the number of signatures obtained on an initiative or referendum petition." Wolfe, the chief petitioner of Initiative Petition 24 in 2012, petitions for judicial review of a final order of the Secretary of State (secretary) that imposed a civil penalty of $65,000 against Wolfe for 26 violations of Article IV, section 1b 's prohibition against paying circulators per signature collected. Although Wolfe raises several assignments of error, we…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Meyer v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Couey v. ClarnoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020