Legal Opinion

State v. Pallet

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 31, 1973No. 34PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

“No indictment, whether at common law or under a statute, can be good if it does not accurately and clearly allege all of the constituent elements of the crime sought to be charged. It must charge the offense with sufficient certainty to apprise the defendant of the specific accusation against him so as to enable him to prepare his defense and to protect him from a subsequent prosecution for the same, offense, and to enable the court to proceed to judgment.

“An indictment or warrant is sufficient if it charges the offense in a plain, intelligible, and explicit manner,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. . LuedersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Fulghum v. Town of SelmaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. TranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. In re E.G.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Byron v. Synco Props., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. BuescherNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API