Legal Opinion
United States v. Carol Lee Ragland and Arthur Elwood Williams
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 21, 1962No. 8545_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKSDALE, District Judge.
On January 5, 1962, pursuant to a jury’s verdict of guilty, a judgment of conviction was entered against Carol Lee Ragland, Arthur Elwood Williams and Charles Royland Liskie of conspiracy to possess sugar intended to be used in the production of distilled spirits (18 U.S. C.A. § 371; 26 U.S.C.A. § 5686(a)), and of the substantive offense of unlawful possession of sugar intended for use in violating the internal revenue laws of the United States (26 U.S.C.A. § 5686 (a); 18 U.S.C.A. § 2), and prison sentences were imposed. From this judgment of conviction, Ragland and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Graves v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Stoppelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- White v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Metz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- The United States of America v. Benjamin Levinson, Franklin Mortgage Corporation, Edward P. Strang, Jr., Ross HowardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Roy Braswell ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- State v. GarvinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.