Legal Opinion
Stoppelli v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 23, 1950No. 12373_1PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
Stoppelli and four others were named defendants in a three count indictment. The first count charged the sale of heroin. Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 2553, 2557. The second count charged the concealment of heroin. Jones-Miller Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 174. The third count charged conspiracy to commit the offenses charged in the first two; All' defendants were convicted by a jury on all counts.' The District Judge granted Stoppelli’s motion for a new trial as to the third (conspiracy) count. Stoppelli appeals from the judgment and the concurrent sentences of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- White v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Obadiah StephensonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.