Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Kootsillas

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1998No. 105721, Calendar No. 1PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

We granted leave to determine whether the city of Riverview can be held hable under the proprietary function exception to governmental immunity for injuries that occurred at its landfill. We conclude that operation of the landfill is a proprietary function and that the city is subject to Lability.

i

In 1967, city of Riverview voters approved a bond proposal to purchase real property for a landfill. Construction started in the summer of 1968, and by 1969, the landfill was operating. By 1990, it served seventeen municipal customers in the southern Wayne County area. It also accepted commercial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hyde v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Patterson v. KleimanMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Curry v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Kootsillas v. City of RiverviewMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Dextrom v. Wexford CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Herman v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Davis v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Michigan Township Participating Plan v. Federal InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API