Legal Opinion

People v. Lanham

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1937No. Crim. 1555PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

—The defendant has attempted to appeal from an order denying his motion to vacate a judgment of conviction of the crime of attempt to commit rape and violation of the provisions of section 288 of the Penal Code. On appeal the judgment of conviction which was rendered September 6, 1933, was affirmed. (People v. Lanham, 137 Cal. App. 737 [31 Pac. (2d) 410].) Three years after the judgment of conviction was rendered the defendant filed and presented to the trial court a motion to set the judgment aside on the ground that the court was without jurisdiction to pronounce judgment for the reason…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SchwarzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. LanhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. CalkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. McGaughranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. People v. KretchmarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API