People v. McGaughran
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
Defendant was found guilty by a jury of, count 1, violation of section 220, Penal Code, assault with intent to commit rape on a female under the age of 18 years, and count 2, violation of section 664, attempted rape of a female under 18 years of age. On motion of the district attorney the court dismissed count l. Defendant appeals from his conviction of count 2 and denial of his motion for new trial.
Questions Presented
1. Should the court have instructed the jury to fix the place of imprisonment?
2. Sufficiency of evidence: (a) Testimony of prosecutrix, (b) Evidence of intent to commit rape.
3.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. RalphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. RuppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. GreenwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. BreslinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- State v. MarlarIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. RedmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.