Daniels v. State

GOLDEN, Chief Justice.

Appellant Marvin Daniels (Daniels) appeals from an order extending his probation for failure to satisfy a restitution obligation. Daniels contends there is no factual showing in the record that the restitution amount is reasonable. Because we find this contention is barred by res judicata, we affirm the district court’s order extending his probation.

ISSUES

Daniels states the issue as:

I. Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the amount of restitution ordered by the district court.

The State claims the issue is:

Whether appellant waived his right to challenge the…