Legal Opinion
Lane-Rauth v. Barnhart
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 20, 2006No. Civil Action 00-02843 (RMU)PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment of Reversal; Denying the Defendant’s motion for Judgment of Af-firmance; Remanding the Case for Further Action
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Margaret Ann Lane-Rauth, claims that she is entitled to Social Security disability benefits due to severe pain and physical impairments suffered as a result of an on-the-job injury. The Commissioner of Social Security denied each of the plaintiffs requests for benefits, relying on an Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) ruling that the plaintiff can perform “substantial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Terry Steele v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Darius Scott v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Cordie Curry v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Pinkney v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Banks v. ASTUREDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Cunningham v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Goodman v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Davis v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.