Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Colvin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 30, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0585PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Re Document Nos.: 9, 10
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS United States District Judge
Denying Plaintiff’s Motion FOR Judgment
OF REVERSAL; AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S Motion for Judgment of Affirmance
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Brenda Cunningham commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) against Defendant, the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”), seeking review of the SSA Commissioner’s denial of her claims for disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income payments under sections 216(1), 223, and 1611 of the Social Security Act. See 42 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Nannie MICKLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Rossello Ex Rel. Rossello v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Roscoe Simms v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Goodman v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Holland v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Mitchell-Jenkins v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Williams v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bennett v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.