Legal Opinion
Pinkney v. Astrue
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 18, 2009No. Civil Action 07-00352 (RCL)PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs motion for judgment of reversal of the defendant’s final administrative decision denying plaintiffs claim for Disability Insurance Benefits. Upon consideration of plaintiffs motion [13] for judgment of reversal, the defendant’s motion as corrected [19, 20, 21] for judgment of affirmance, the applicable law, and the entire record herein, the Court concludes that plaintiffs motion is DENIED and defendant’s motion is GRANTED. The Court’s reasoning is discussed below.
BACKGROUND
I. Procedural Background
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Ronda S. CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Jackie L. HAYS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Cunningham v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Ward v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- ADEMAKINWA v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Charles v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Nicholson v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.