Legal Opinion
Simard v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 10, 2001No. AC 19765PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PELLEGRINO, J.
The plaintiff, Edgar Simard, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the decision of the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner) suspending his motor vehicle operator’s license pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 14-227b. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly dismissed his appeal because the record lacked substantial evidence sufficient to permit the hearing officer to suspend his *692motor vehicle operator’s license. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BladesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Briggs v. State Employees Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Burinskas v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Bancroft v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- City of Stamford v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Evans v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Crandlemire v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Braver v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001