Legal Opinion

Greif v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 11, 2000No. 3:00CV995 (GLG)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

The defendants move to dismiss the plaintiffs’ action brought pro se 1 in Connecticut State Court and removed to the federal court by them on diversity grounds.

This action results from a terrible tragedy. According to the complaint, Mrs. Greif was stopped on a bicycle on the edge of Route 4 in Farmington, Connecticut when a motor vehicle driven by Elmer Michaud crossed over the roadway and struck her, causing serious injuries to her. The complaint alleges that Michaud had consumed the defendants’ “products” and was under their influence. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Boehm v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. Garthwait v. BurgioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Godoy Ex Rel. Gramling v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bruner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
  3. Phusion Projects, Inc. v. Selective Insurance Compary of South CarolinaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  4. Cook v. MillerCoors, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
  5. Godoy Ex Rel. Gramling v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API