In re the Estate of Liell
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.(1) The principal dispute in this contested accounting proceeding arises over the payment to Samuel W. Lowenberg, the attorney for the administratrices, of fifty per cent of the gross estate under a contingent retainer signed by them. The sole asset of the estate consisted of a bank deposit amounting to $6,500. The attorney has been paid $3,250, under his contingent agreement. There are three next of kin, a sister and two nieces of the decedent, each entitled to one-third of the estate. It appears that the attorney was originally retained by two of the next of kin ■— the sister and a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of MengNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Matter of ReisfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- In re AndersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- In re PierisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Matter of AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Humphrey v. O'SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re Ruane's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1951
- In re the Estate of HealyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938