Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Liell

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 28, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.(1) The principal dispute in this contested accounting proceeding arises over the payment to Samuel W. Lowenberg, the attorney for the administratrices, of fifty per cent of the gross estate under a contingent retainer signed by them. The sole asset of the estate consisted of a bank deposit amounting to $6,500. The attorney has been paid $3,250, under his contingent agreement. There are three next of kin, a sister and two nieces of the decedent, each entitled to one-third of the estate. It appears that the attorney was originally retained by two of the next of kin ■— the sister and a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of MengNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Matter of ReisfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. In re AndersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  4. In re PierisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Matter of AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. O'SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  2. In Re Ruane's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. In re the Estate of HealyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API