Legal Opinion

Humphrey v. O'Sullivan

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1951No. 9030PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:

The record presents two appeals. One is by Mable E. Humphrey, as administratrix of the estate of Mike P. Ruane, from a decree settling her first annual account and disallowing certain items. The other appeal is by Emmet O’Sullivan from an order disallowing him certain attorney’s fees and expenses. The appeals were by order of this court consolidated.

No one has appeared in this court to resist the claims of appellants.

The first question raised is the propriety of the court’s order in disallowing four items of the administratrix’ account, each reading: “Transportation and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In re RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. In Re Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Estate of EmersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Barrett v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. In re Williams' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sikorski v. BruskiMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  2. In Re Ruane's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. In Re Sikorski's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  4. In re the Estate of DygertMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. McDonald v. HoffmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API