Legal Opinion

In Re Ruane's Estate

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1951No. 9030PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

233 P.2d 400 (1951)

In re RUANE'S ESTATE.

HUMPHREY

v.

O'SULLIVAN.

O'SULLIVAN

v.

HUMPHREY.

No. 9030.

Supreme Court of Montana.

June 27, 1951.

Emmet O'Sullivan, Harlowton, for appellant.

ANGSTMAN, Justice.

The record presents two appeals. One is by Mable E. Humphrey, as administratrix of the estate of Mike F. Ruane, from a decree settling her first annual account and disallowing certain items. The other appeal is by Emmet O'Sullivan from an order disallowing him certain attorney's fees and expenses. The appeals were by order of this court consolidated.

No one has appeared in this court to resist the claims…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In re RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. In Re Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Estate of EmersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Barrett v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. In re Williams' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sikorski v. BruskiMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  2. In Re Sikorski's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In re the Estate of DygertMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. McDonald v. HoffmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State Ex Rel. Hill v. District Court of Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API