Legal Opinion

In re Anderson

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 12, 1930PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

This is an application professedly instituted under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act for the purpose of determining the reasonable value of the services of petitioner’s former attorney who has since been discharged. It appears that the services were partly rendered for the estate of which the petitioner is executrix and sole beneficiary and partly for the petitioner as an individual. The former consisted of the probate of the will and the collection of certain sums under an insurance policy, and the latter related to the collection of the principal sum on an insurance…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re FlanaganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  2. Schell v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Matter of Bailey v. RutherfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Gross v. VogelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  5. In re BuckenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of AbruzzoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  2. In re the Estate of WoolfsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of O'BrienNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. Estate of CazaurangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. In Re the Estate of RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API