Cunningham v. Pirrung
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. Fletcher M. Doan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtKent, C. J.
The complaint sets forth facts showing that plaintiffs duly located certain mining claims, and alleges that the plaintiffs are the owners and entitled to the possession *291thereof; that the defendants make some claim to the property —and prays to have the plaintiffs’ title to the property quieted in them. The answer denies the allegation of the complaint as to the location and ownership by the plaintiffs of the property and sets forth facts showing that the defendants made valid locations of the property prior to the locations of the plaintiffs, and alleges the ownership of the property in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hopkins v. NoyesMontana Supreme Court · 1883
- Becker v. PughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- Providence Gold Mining Co. v. BurkeArizona Supreme Court · 1899
- Bryan v. McCaigSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clason v. MatkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Kinney v. LundyArizona Supreme Court · 1907
- Copper State Mining Co. v. KidderArizona Supreme Court · 1919
- Score v. GriffinArizona Supreme Court · 1905
- Buckeye Mining Co. v. PowersIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.