Legal Opinion

Bryan v. McCaig

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Clear Creelo County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Rising, C.

Appellant, as owner of the Ho. í lode mining claim, applied for a patent therefor, and appellees, as owners of the Apex lode mining claim, filed their adverse claim, under the provisions of the statutes of the United States, to that portion of said Ho. i claim which was in conflict with said Apex claim; and, within the time required by law, appellees brought this action in support of such adverse claim. The plaintiffs predicate their right to the possession of the premises in controversy upon a full compliance by them with all the requirements of the laws of the United States, and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Becker v. PughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. PirrungArizona Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Copper Globe Mining Co. v. AllmanUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Duncan v. Eagle Rock Gold Mining & Reduction Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. Beals v. ConeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  5. Gold, Silver & Tungsten, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API