Kinney v. Lundy
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, in and for the County of Gila. Frederick S. Nave, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtKent, C. J.
— Lundy brought suit in the court below against Clara A. Kinney to .quiet his title to a mining claim *78in G-iia. county known as the “Little May,” alleging that he had duly located the claim on April 1, 1903. The defendant filed an answer and cross-complaint, alleging that the premises covered by the plaintiff’s location were not at the time of his location unoccupied public domain of the United States, but that the property covered by the Little May location had theretofore, and on the second day of January, 1896, been duly located by one Alfred Kinney as a claim known as the “Rosaline No.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- New York & Long Island Bridge Co. v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Beecher v. Marquette & Pacific Rolling Mill Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Strepey v. StarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- Frazier v. JeakinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Van Cleef v. Aeroflex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Clason v. MatkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Karnes v. FlintWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Collier v. General Exchange Ins. Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.