Clason v. Matko
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP ARIZONA. The facts, which involve the construction and constitutionality of the mining laws of Arizona .and the validity of a mining location thereunder, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
Action to quiet title to a mining claim called the “Bangor.” The action was brought in the District Court of the First Judicial District, County of Pima, Arizona, by appellees as plaintiffs against August Daley, Clason, appellant here, subsequently being made a party. It will be convenient to refer to appellees as plaintiffs and, except where necessary to expressly distinguish appellant, to include him with Daley under the designation of defendants.
The amended complaint alleged the location of the claim by one Scott Turner and the recording of the notice thereof, a copy of which was annexed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Butte City Water Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Fox v. HaarstickSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- English v. Territory of Arizona Ex Rel. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Commissioners of Santa Fé County v. Territory of New Mexico Ex Rel. ColerSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Albright v. Sandoval (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- De Castro v. Board of Comm'rs of San JuanSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Phoenix Railway Co. v. LandisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Commissioner v. FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Applied Industrial Materials Corp. v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Stock v. PlunkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.