Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. HJ Heinz Company

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 1975Published

1Opinion of the Court

462 Pa. 111 (1975)

337 A.2d 907

Darious E. HINKLE, Appellant,

v.

H.J. HEINZ COMPANY, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided May 19, 1975.

Lloyd F. Engle, Jr., J. Craig Kuhn, Kuhn, Engle, Blair & Stein, Pittsburgh, for appellant.

William L. Standish, IV, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, for appellee.

Before JONES, C.J., and EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

EAGEN, Justice.

This is a case of first impression within this Commonwealth. In it, we are asked to determine whether workmen's compensation benefits may be awarded for a partial loss of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Hamilton v. Procon, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API