Legal Opinion

Waters v. Garris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1924PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs’ Appeal.

Stacy, J.

The principal question presented by plaintiffs’ appeal relates to the statute of limitations. The trial court held that plaintiffs were entitled to have their notes credited with the forfeiture of the entire interest charged, and twice the amount of usurious interest paid within two years next immediately preceding the commencement of the action, but not for any sums paid more thaU two years prior to that time. C. S., 442. After making these deductions, judgment of foreclosure was entered over objection by the defendant. In the view which we take of the case, as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The Columbia Insurance Company of Alexandria, in Error v. Joseph W. Lawrence, Who Survived Thomas PoindexterSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. KrumseigSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Fowler v. Equitable Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Hubbard v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Ripple v. Mortgage & Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Kawauchi v. TabataHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  4. S. B. Parker Co. v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Wilson v. Union Trust Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API