Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Norfolk

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1957No. File 9607PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRentto, J.

This is an action for damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff in an automobile accident. She was riding in a car driven by her husband when it was involved in a collision with a car driven by the defendant. As one defense it is urged that plaintiff had compromised and settled the claim sued on and had released defendant from all liability therefor. In reply, plaintiff claimed that the release relied on was invalid because it had been obtained by fraud and misrepresentation.

On motion of the defendant the issues raised concerning the release, pursuant to SDC 33.1303, were tried separately…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Landau v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Fair Mercantile Co. v. Union-May-Stern Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Nilsson v. KruegerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Boekelheide v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Ford v. RobinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Drier v. Perfection, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Heer v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Skoglund v. StaabSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Kroupa v. KroupaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Parkhurst v. BurkelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API