Legal Opinion

State v. Peralta

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 27, 1999No. C6-99-310PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge

Appellant State of Minnesota appeals from the district court’s pretrial order excluding from a perjury prosecution respondent Richard Peralta’s withdrawn guilty plea from a previous criminal sexual conduct prosecution. Because we conclude Minn. R.Crim. P. 15.06 and Minn. R. Evid. 410 bar the use of Peralta’s withdrawn plea in a subsequent perjury prosecution and are not in conflict with MinmStat. § 609.48, we affirm.

FACTS

Peralta was charged on June 4, 1997, with one count of second-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of MinmStat. § 609.343, subd. 1(a). Peralta…

2Cases cited7 opinions

State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
State v. FolkersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

State v. AkersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008