Legal Opinion
State v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 5, 1982No. 81-1331PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
Defendant appeals his burglary conviction and a denial of his motion for a new trial on the ground that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of statements made by the defendant to a probation officer during a presentence investigation pursuant to a guilty plea which was subsequently withdrawn. We agree the statements were improperly admitted and we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Defendant Charles Jackson was arrested for burglarizing a Minneapolis apartment and entered a plea of not guilty. Thereafter, as a result of negotiations, Jackson appeared in court and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. David R. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. BlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Allgood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- State v. AmidonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- State v. O'HAGANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. Robledo-KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.