Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 16, 2008No. A07-0599PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARKIN, Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction for attempted second-degree murder, arguing that (1) the admission at trial of statements made by appellant at his omnibus hearing in response to a plea offer tendered by the state violated Minn. R. Evid. 410 and (2) the evidence was insufficient to support appellant’s conviction. Appellant also raises a pro se claim regarding the prosecutor’s failure to submit a lesser-included offense to the jury. We hold that statements made by a defendant that are not part of a guilty plea or an offer to plead guilty are admissible under Minn. R.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. United States v. Andrew Jackson RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API