Legal Opinion

In re Phelps

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 30, 2002No. 2002-B-1837PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1141ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

|,PER CURIAM.

This matter arises from a petition for consent discipline submitted by respondent, Claud Edward Phelps, prior to the filing of formal charges by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”).

UNDERLYING FACTS

This proceeding involves seven separate instances of misconduct. The facts, as stipulated to by the parties, are as follows:

General Facts

Respondent was admitted to the bar in 1992. During the time period at issue, he was employed by the law firm of Steven Rue and Associates. He has been disciplined on one prior occasion, receiving an admonition in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In re DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. In re WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  5. In re HorneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re CantrellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  2. In re DeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  3. In re PhelpsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  4. In re SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  5. In re PhelpsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API