Legal Opinion
Jonathan Gold v. Deutsche Aktiengesellschaft, Deutsche Morgan grenfell/c.j. Lawrence, Inc., Peter Nason, and Gregory Williams
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 21, 2004No. Docket 03-7283PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Jonathan Gold was hired by defendant-appellee Deutsche Aktiengesellschaft (“Deutsche Bank” or the “Bank”) in 1995. Before beginning his employment, Gold signed various documents, including one that contained an arbitration clause requiring all employment disputes with the firm to be arbitrated. After his termination from the company approximately a year later, Gold brought the instant suit under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to e-17, and state law, claiming sexual harassment based on sexual orientation. The United States District Court for the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Ragone v. Atlantic Video at the Manhattan CenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Daly v. Citigroup Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Campbell v. General Dynamics Government Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Beatie and Osborn LLP v. Patriot Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Goldman, Sachs & Co. v. Golden Empire Schools Financing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.