Legal Opinion

State v. Kealoha

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 2000No. 22384PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that, under the facts of this case, the acts of Defendant-Appellant Geraldine Kealoha (Defendant) in allegedly manufacturing methamphetamine in violation of Ha-wai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 712-1241(1)(d) (Supp.1999), Promoting a Dangerous Drug in the First Degree, constituted a single continuous offense and not “separate and distinct culpable acts.” Thus, there was no requirement that the prosecution elect a specific act to establish the “conduct” element of the manufacturing charge or that the first circuit court (the court) give the jury a specific…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. EastmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. FurutaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. United States v. Adrian Norman PaysenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. State v. KinnaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. CordeiroHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hayes v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Varble v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. RabagoHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. HironakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API