Legal Opinion

Greenleaf v. Jacks

California Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1901No. L.A. No. 863PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

—This action' is brought in San Luis Obispo County, and is based upon several certificates of deposit issued by the County Bank of San Luis Obispo County. This bank is alleged to have been located, as to its principal place of business, in the county of San Luis Obispo, and the certificates of deposit are dated at San Luis Obispo, California, and provide for the repayment to plaintiff of the several amounts deposited by her, with interest thereon at “ five per cent per annum until due.” It is further alleged in the complaint that the said several amounts were “ loaned to and deposited…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sayward v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hearne v. De YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brown v. Happy Valley Fruit Growers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hellman v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Freeman v. DowlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Wood, Curtis & Co. v. Herman Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Danielson v. DanielsonMontana Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API