Legal Opinion
Crosbie v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 3, 1958No. A-12605PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POWELL, Judge.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged by information in the court of common pleas of Tulsa County with the offense of practicing dentistry without a license. A jury was waived and defendant was tried before the court, convicted and punishment assessed at a fine of $500, and to serve a term of thirty days in the Tulsa County jail.
The pertinent portion of the information reads:
“That on the 10th day of August, A. D.1957, and prior to the filing of this information in Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, Gilbert A. Crosbie in said county, and within…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Shouquette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Rider v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
- Savage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
- Lazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Riddle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Escobedo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. BurkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.