Legal Opinion

Lazar v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1954No. A-11973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POWELL, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff in error, Jack Lazar, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged by information filed in the district court of Okfuskee County with the crime of “obtaining property by trick or deception, .by false or fraudulent representations and statements, and by the use of false and bogus instruments in violation of Section 1541 of Title 21 of Oklahoma Statutes of 1951”; was tried before a jury, convicted, and the jury assessed the penalty at imprisonment in the State Penitentiary for a term of four years, and the payment of a fine of $500. Appeal has been…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Upshaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Morton v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Graham v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Acuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Crosbie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Stokes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Beavers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Shewmaker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API