Legal Opinion

Amundson v. Catello

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 2025No. D082158Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 3/20/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TAMARA AMUNDSON et al., D082158 Cross-complainants and Respondents. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2022-00004784- v. CU-OR-CTL) RUTH CATELLO, Cross-defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Kevin A. Enright, Judge. Appellant’s request for judicial notice denied. Respondents’ motion to augment granted. Reversed. Higgs Fletcher & Mack, John Morris and Steven M. Brunolli, for Cross- defendant and Appellant. Leo Law Office, Shawn Leo; Williams…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Cloud v. Northrop Grumman Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. CarrascoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Mendoza v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API