Legal Opinion

Norden v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 20, 1999No. CV 95-0002; CA A93331PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

The Water Resources Department (department) issued an order requiring petitioner Norden to obtain a water rights permit to use water from a spring on her property. The principal basis for the order was the department’s finding that the water from the spring, if not diverted, would run off Norden’s property, thereby triggering the need for a permit. Norden sought judicial review of the department’s order, contending that the department erred in finding that the water would run off of her property if not diverted. After hearing the evidence, the trial court concluded that Norden was correct and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burke v. Children's Services DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Morrison v. OfficerOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Beisell Et Ux. v. Wood Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Klamath Development Co. v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Turczynski v. GrillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norden v. STATE, WATER RESOURCES DEPT.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. G.A.S.P. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Polaski v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API