Legal Opinion

Keeton-King Construction, Inc. v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 1991No. 88-CV-0392-WE; CA A61864PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Keeton-King Construction, Inc. (petitioner) seeks review of our decision. 105 Or App 41, 802 P2d 711 (1990). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, allow it, modify our opinion and adhere to our opinion as modified.

The trial court determined that the Department of General Services (DGS) had erroneously interpreted the law in concluding that the actions set out in ORS 200.045(2) (a)-(j) {since amended by Or Laws 1989, ch 1043, § 8) are mandatory and that petitioner’s failure to perform any one of them precludes a finding of good faith. We agree that DGS erroneously…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Keeton-King Construction Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Portello v. Oregon State System of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Teel Irrigation District v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Polaski v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Teel Irrigation District v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API