Legal Opinion

American Oil Co. v. Hulme

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 9, 1935No. 10750PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

“The office of an injunction being, under the Code of this State, merely to restrain and not to compel the performance of an act, this remedy is not available for the purpose of evicting a party from the actual possession of land, the right to which is in dispute, between himself and another.” Vaughn v. Yawn, 103 Ga. 557 (29 S. E. 759). Code of 1933, § 55-110; Beacham v. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad Co., 125 Ga. 362 (54 S. E. 157) ; Trudie Turpentine Co. v. Pearson, 159 Ga. 387 (125 S. E. 862) ; Beck v. Kah, 163 Ga. 365 (136 S. E. 160). There was some evidence to authorize…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mackenzie v. MinisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Marshall v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Vaughn v. YawnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Beck v. KahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  5. Beacham v. Wrightsville & Tennille RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cannon v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Smith v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Horton v. HarveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  4. Taylor v. NixSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Hieber v. BuchananSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API