Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Nix

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 19, 1938No. 12034PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

A controversy arose over location of the line between Nix and Taylor, who were adjoining proprietors. Processioners appointed on application of Nix marked out a line which extended through land on which were pine trees then being worked for turpentine purposes by Taylor. Taylor filed a protest to the return of the processioners. After the line had been marked, Nix proceeded to “dip the cups” placed by Taylor, and otherwise work the trees for turpentine purposes on the land, up to the line. Taylor brought suit to enjoin such work, and obtained a restraining order.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cannon v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. May v. SorrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Flannery & Co. v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. McRae v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Vaughn v. YawnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rees v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Jeppeson v. State, Dept. of State LandsMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hamilton v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  4. Brown v. BishopSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API